Encountering as being with

A flash and a flicker outside my office window caught my eye yesterday. There, on the leaf litter before me, in its sleek form, was a Monitor. It spotted me, froze and slinked off under a grevillia bush. Not long after, a Grey Goshawk landed on the same grevillia. It too had spotted the Monitor and was sizing it up. In the seconds before it flew away, our eyes met and I was filled with a sense of being with this life form. Whilst our meeting was fleeting, I was left with a sense that we had bridged a perceived space; we had encountered one another. It was synchronous then that I was in the middle of reading Freya Mathews’ (2003) descriptions of encountering; people encountering people, non-human life forms and ‘inanimate‘ aspects of country. She writes about encounter as a way of relating to the world, which is potent with the possibility of being with if we invite those ‘things’ that we see as objects to become subjects. 

A question that Mathews (2003) raises which caused me to pause and wonder was

‘But how are we, in our present cultures of disenchantment, to understand encounter with the non-human world? What forms of response might we expect from nonhuman subjects? Is it perhaps not too difficult to imagine the responsiveness of fully sentient beings to our overtures. But the barely sentient, or altogether nonsentient? How might encounter with plants, for instance, be imagined?’ (p. 81).

Is this calling of non-human sentient and nonsentient beings and entities into the subjectival realm really a question of agency? If we assume that everything that is present in and on the land (e.g. trees, animals, rocks, water, spirits, people) has agency, does that make all of these entities subjects?

I am reminded too of the words of Paddy Roe and Frans Hoogland (1999) who write about country as a living entity…

‘… where the land is whole and complete; where the interaction between people and land is alive through law and culture; where the spirit of the land is ‘standing up’, and ‘vibrant” (p. 30).

I feel as though I am being invited to see the whole of country as something to encounter, to be with. 

The final thread that I want to weave into this conversation is the Yolngu pronoun ŋayi (ngayi) which is used to refer to he/she/it. Is the between gender and sentient/non-sentient/inanimate a deliberate attempt to shape perception of everything as subject? To all my Yolngu teachers out there please comment! 


References 

Mathews, F. (2003). For love of matter: a contemporary panpsychism. Albany: State University of New York Press. 

Roe, P., & Hoogland, F. (1999). Black and white, a trail to understanding. In J. Sinatra & P. Murphy (Eds.), Listen to the People, Listen to the Land (pp. 11-30). Carlton: Melbourne University Press.

1 Comment

Filed under Theory

One response to “Encountering as being with

  1. I can really appreciate your response to your encounter with the goanna and the peregrine falcon. There is something about looking each other in the eye, which touches us all, it seems. There's a story in my family that when I was just a toddler, I was inspecting an ant and then said, 'Heck! That ants looking at me!' Last week I was out on country with Yolngu, and an older lady was using my binoculars to watch buffalo on the other side of a flood plain. She laughed and said, 'That buffalo's looking at me.'So, what is it about being 'seen to be seen'? There is a train of thought that acknowledges that when we look at something/see something, we are changed. We can even justify it with chemistry as a visual memory is created with neurone pathways. I would think the significant thing is what other neural networks get linked to the visual memory. It's obvious when very significant things happen, particularly traumatic events, that forever get linked with certain images, feelings, memories et al. Somehow I think that those mutual seeing event links into something potentially powerful for us. My own theory is that we are all homesick for the sense of utterly belonging to the whole, and anything which breaks down our very human individuality, our sense of being one, alone, separate comes connected to powerful feelings of well being. I think that those moments when creatures (human-human, human-animal) look into each other's eyes let us into that domain, just briefly, and it feels fabulous. I still recall exchanging a cold glance with an eagle when I was climbing in the Grampians a decade ago!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s